Re: Motion capture as subset of Motion Tracking

From: Alanmurdock@aol.com
Date: 01/07/02


Lisa, I've seen a lot of work that uses light sensing technology (like the 
kind that turns on a flood light in your yard when someone attempts to sneak 
in your back door -- most are more targeted than that, but they perform the 
same function) to trigger events in a way that enacts no dynamic transaction 
with the dance environment.  The performer may trigger sound or the beginning 
of a video sequence, but, in many of these performances there is little that 
could constitute "tracking."  So maybe we should use a variety of language 
including trigger, tracking, and capture.  I also want to make it clear that 
I'm not trying to depreciate any of these categories.  I've seen each used 
both well and poorly. 

One of the best uses of motion capture and worst uses of motion tracking I 
have seen was in a solo concert by Bill T. Jones at Hancher Auditorium in 
Iowa City, Iowa two years ago.  Bill performed two dances, then spoke, then a 
screen dropped down and showed an animation of a circulatory system dancing 
Bill's steps.  Motion capture was used to continue Bill's modernist theme of 
paring things down to their essence for the purpose of unifying everyone in 
the auditorium.  His metaphor was that of growing a garden.

Later in the performance Bill announced that the his movement during an 
extended improvisation on the stage would be tracked, and based on certain 
parameters that had been programed into a computer back stage, the music 
would transition from one track to another.  He then asked the audience to 
choose something like five of seven musical titles.  These were the songs 
that would inspire him to dance and that would be influenced by his dance.  
Bill danced and the songs changed from one to another, then the music ended 
abruptly.  Iowa City is a community that gives big money to Bill to create 
new work.  They understand his work, but this they didn't understand.  Even 
to those of us in the audience who understood the goals of technology in art, 
it was a big who cares.  It would have been just as interesting, maybe more 
so, if a stage tech had been switching the music.  This use of technology 
also broke completely from the theme of the evening, which is only important 
in that Bill defined the evening under a unified theme.

The point I'm getting at is that the value of a technology or technique rests 
in its ability to facilitate the completion of a project rather than its 
inherent qualities.  A motion trigger may be better than motion tracking in a 
certain performance, while in another tracking may function best.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 01/24/02