Re: Life Forms Generated Choreography

From: Annelie David (d_annelie@hotmail.com)
Date: 08/22/01


>From: "Samara L. Thompson" <samarat@yorku.ca>
>Reply-To: dance-tech@lists.acs.ohio-state.edu
>To: dance-tech@lists.acs.ohio-state.edu
>Subject: Re: Life Forms Generated Choreography
>Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 13:17:07 -0400
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from [128.146.214.27] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id 
>MHotMailBD4BF4C4002E400437248092D61BBBB50; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:34:53 -0700
>Received: from host (localhost [127.0.0.1])by lists.acs.ohio-state.edu 
>(8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA04340;Tue, 21 Aug 2001 14:34:42 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: from sungod.ccs.yorku.ca (sungod.ccs.yorku.ca [130.63.236.104])by 
>lists.acs.ohio-state.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA22222for 
><dance-tech@lists.acs.ohio-state.edu>; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 13:17:07 -0400 
>(EDT)
>Received: from yorku.ca (mulder13.slip.yorku.ca [130.63.190.221])by 
>sungod.ccs.yorku.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA16219;Tue, 21 Aug 2001 
>13:17:04 -0400 (EDT)
>From owner-dance-tech@lists.acs.ohio-state.edu Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:36:32 
>-0700
>Message-Id: <3B829793.3C8B5558@yorku.ca>
>Sender: owner-dance-tech@lists.acs.ohio-state.edu
>Precedence: bulk
>References: <F38SJkrrod75CUnJYX9000095ea@hotmail.com>
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; U; PPC)
>X-Accept-Language: en
>X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
>
>Hello!
>
>I agree with you that there are still numerous possibilities to be explored
>with Life Forms, as there are with dance and technology.
>
>I deliberately selected human figures to animate as that was my 
>choreographic
>interest.  I decided, however, not to use faces, so that there was a level 
>of
>abstraction.  The closer the figures look to "real" the more others notice 
>how
>they are not.  I felt the abstraction would facilitate a bit of acceptance 
>of
>the digitized body and movements which were not always humanly possible.  
>In
>other parts of my work (which I didn't have on the site), the projections 
>that
>the dancers interacted with were shown in a variety of drawing styles, like
>sticks and outlines, to further illustrate various ways to represent the 
>human
>body.
>
>As dance artists abstract the human form more and more, perhaps we are 
>seeing
>the blending of dance and visual arts.  So that could lead us to the bigger
>question of what is dance?

This is exactly the field of my interest. This question leads to the 
distinction of what is dance and what is choreography? Personally I think 
that dance is made far to often from out the experience of the dancer rather 
then from out a distant perspective to compose movement through space and 
time. Therefore i think that the exploration of 'impossible' movements 
stretches the boundaries and that new technology stretches the boundaries of 
what is possible with dance. And therethrough composition is getting more 
priority. But this is a long discussion, which I like to have. On august the 
30th I'm giving a lecture demonstration at the University Utrecht about the 
that item. Especially how LifeForms gives an overall view on time and space 
and which advantage this has for choreographers and there compositional 
skills.

kind regards, annelie david
>
>
>Annelie David wrote:
>
> > >
> > Dear Samara,
> >
> > I'm glad to see that people are still making work with LifeForms. Here 
>in
> > The Netherlands most of the choreographers are thinking that it is an
> > oldfashion tool. In my opinion The tool isn't yet explored enough to 
>make
> > such a statement.
> >
> > Your choreography is a clearly defined piece of work. My question is 
>while
> > working with LifeForms too: Why trying to make it as realistic as 
>possible,
> > especially using the models looking like dancers? I'm wondering what can 
>we
> > do with choreography else then working with "dancers"? But that is of 
>course
> > a very personal point of view and doesn't really relate to your work.
> >
> > keep ongoing,
> >
> > Annelie David
> >
> > >
> > >Hi!
> > >I am presenting a new piece of choreography at the fringe Festival of
> > >Independent Artist (fFIDA) in Toronto.  The dance creates an 
>environment
> > >where live dancers interact with their computer-generated counterparts.
> > >These virtual partners have been animated using Life Forms.  If you
> > >would like more detailed information, please check out my web site at
> > >http://telusplanet.net/public/brthomp/home.html
> > >
> > >I would be very interested in feedback and comments on my work.  Please
> > >send them to samarat@mac.com
> > >
> > >Thanks!
> > >
> > >Samara L. Thompson
> > >
> > >[Image]
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at 
>http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 01/24/02