<x-flowed>>How I define higher-order is something beyond who we are in the moment.
>Yes, it is touchy thing to make comments regarding the metaphysical in
>suchan environment as this, because clear, concrete, all-encompassing
>definitions are impossible when you are relaying thoughts on the
>non-tangible. If it were possible, people would have stopped their
>attempts to define G-d, love, faith, and many other things long ago.
>
>Peace
>
>Jody
Jody,
I believe what you're driving at is ...
....ss the "adjectives of d-G" we express our faith, love, etc. beyond
language.....certainly the written/spoken kind.
Dance, being another language.... is one with which some have well expressed
the concepts you indicate, simply through (and this is my belief) their
power to actually BE in the moment....with their "tool" of expression....
Now, throw in a little I-O (technology) and .......??????WHAT??????
are we any better able to communicate the indefinable?
I think so..... I believe we are (in a better position, that is).
But I'm not so sure we're going about it in any better (higher) way than the
ones who sat down to write or stood up to speak.
Just different adjectives.
Ah, just what is "the message" anyway?
(I-O) have no idea
0!Z!^!P Z P!^VP
@
d^vid 2 diviZi0
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
</x-flowed>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 03/28/01 CST