<x-flowed>Julie,
By *art* do you mean *A*rt?, *a*rt? or *^Rt*?
Definitions come of such judgements, which though personal are the
synthesis/integration of much broader cultural influences/factors...
Consider the difference: "communication of the Art"
and "the art of Communication",
in the context of *expression*
and
how we see ourselves "influencing /
being influenced BY"
such expression.
Above all it's personal...ie. up to U (echoing dawn's point)
either
*I dO* or I *d O-I n't*, again echoing Dawn's point.
Which somehow reminds of
Marcel Duchamp: "Children's art isn't art at all.
Because Children aren't artists....!
and so:
are "New *comp(0I)ters* children's toys?
or are we (as/like) Children with New toys,*comp(0I)ters*....?
0!Z!^!P Z P!^VP
@
d^vid 2 diviZi0
> >
> >What kinds of questions and opinions are coming up on the Dance
>tech-lists
> >concerning the view of whether or not interactive dance is considered
>art?
> >
> >I'm a dance major at Towson University in Towson MD, and am interested in
>the
> >validity and or positions of opinios of interactive dance on the net as
>art.
> >
> >thankyou,
> >Julie Holdt
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
</x-flowed>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 03/28/01 CST