Hi Julie, to judge what is supposed to be art or not is quite a big issue. Why should it not be art when dancers start wearing sensors, when it was considered to be art without? Does it make sense at all to give this motion tracking technologie to dancers? The first reason for a dancer to move is an optical one, if this movement suddenly will cause sound or other things directly related to it, the whole thing changes. Maybe we should discuss first what is "interactive dance" and - why? josh JAHoldt@aol.com wrote : > What kinds of questions and opinions are coming up on the Dance tech-lists > concerning the view of whether or not interactive dance is considered art? > > I'm a dance major at Towson University in Towson MD, and am interested in the > validity and or positions of opinios of interactive dance on the net as art. > > thankyou, > Julie Holdt
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 03/28/01 CST