subject? ...hmmm.....(long story)

From: IrisTenge@aol.com
Date: 09/11/00


Greetings to all,


I'm Iris, dancer-choreographer, tribal background: ex- Forsythe's Frankfurt 
Ballet, and diverse elsewheres; not technic-ally inter-active but otherwise 
yes...;

I've been following your committed discussion with great interest for some 
six weeks, and need to thank you for much stimulation and inspiration. And 
for making it available, and the archives, and so on.

Much has been said on this forum about irrelevance of /  ----->  thinking 
beyond dichotomies. 
Not surprisingly, I found most of the issues you've raised equally relevant 
'whether or not' technology is employed; more precisely, every-day reality is 
way past  whether or not, but at choosing how, where, which, and this for 
everybody. Making good and interesting choices ----------  jaaaa, that's the 
bit, isn't it?

Dawn Stoppiello advised, chuck those insecurities, no need to justify. Robert 
Wechsler noted musicians' confidence.
Could it be that various questions have more fundamentally to do with how danc
e is recognized - or not - (as Douglas Rosenberg stated) - in our culture?
If the focus of a discussion were on how we - dancers, artists with a dance 
background, today - 
perceive, practice, and argue what we do, might we find issues yet to be 
asked, even while old categories no longer fit an interdisciplinary reality?

If I may venture on, reframing questions and further disregarding the lists' 
title denoting genre-specifics,

tentatively speaking, there might be "dance-originated ways of making good 
and interesting choices"... some of which may have been inconspicuous until 
recently, 'falling through the grid' of definitions, and it would help us to 
evaluate and clarify on that.

A charming irony of a coincidence just now, as I picked up my Thesaurus 
(book), it opened on the page of Quantity; while I had in mind writing about 
non-quantifyables. 
Say no more.
(Of course 'it' didn't open by itself, but upon my physical interference. 
Example of choice via body?)

There are so many 'things' which can't be said  --------- although lived, 
danced, embodied, discovered, realized... --- and we know as dancers, 
artists, our bodies know, body-mind, organismic awareness etc.... all of 
which is (still?) difficult to argue in Western language, intellectual 
tradition and art theory; language itself implying / 'creating'  objects, 
assuming superiority of the rational intellect over the 'biological body', or 
finding in 'object-producing art' a better subject. It seems to me these 
assumptions are still there - albeit somewhat hidden or in deconstruction - 
in many contemporary / anti-traditional /  even 'body-interested'  positions. 
The Nuba, so I've read (Leni Riefenstahl), have over a hundred  words for 
sitting and squatting. Native North American languages 'lack' separate words 
for either art or religion - not that they lack the 'thing'. And in some 
Eastern cultures "the Body is what makes this 'stuff' alive!" (Richard 
Baker-roshi); a quadrangular surface is defined not by four points, but five. 
The fifth is actually the first, and - you guessed it -  center, and guess 
who....
 
In contrast to other cultures, dance and the body were the considered 
anything but sacred during most of Western history. Science achieved 
liberation from the Church's authority by the deal of concerning itself with 
quantity and objectivity.  These very notions of quantity and objectivity 
have been put in question, new scientific and philosophical questions 
continue to be raised, and with technological progress the pace of change 
continues to increase ----- 

Umphhhhhh---------, all this is a jitteringly daring manège of glissading 
jumps and leaving out so much I know I 
know--------but-I-can't-stop-now--just-gotta-do-this-try-take-it-further-risk-
fall-catch-keep-going-yikes-wheeeere-oops-here-ahhh-and-on---------> -> -> 
->.................

............as dancers we've long lived with/in silence and practiced our art 
and knowing

that which we don't say because it can't be said is still at the core of what 
we have to say -----------


and yet
perhaps now finding 
our language 
as a meta-language
of  Body
motion
including silence including sound including
space touch 
& and 
and-ing

this language's resources of
describing knowing communicating 
extending relinking changing connecting shifting solving daring finding
lacking nothing 
perhaps
more precise in contacting realities
more concise in organizing complexities
than has been thought
than has been said

Recognizing 
our bodies' language 
our dancing-bodying-language
as this advanced

which

perhaps just now 
our culture may
be
-coming ready 
to 
hear







regards

good continuation of  the adventure -------------- however you're doing 
it------------------------- :-)


IT.














------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 03/28/01 CST