<x-flowed>>Brian wrote: > >1) have the other people on this list any advice to give re: tools, >software, hardware for developing sensitive, reactive, interactive >and/or Internet related technology-in-performance works - The list is huge and has lots of 'depends...' attached to it. It really depends on what you're looking for. Personally I use BigEye (while half the readers groan). It's cheap, works well for what I want it do BUT you must learn its scripting language, without which it is fairly basic and uninteresting. It tooke me a year or more to get anything 'good' out of it, but now I've been working with it for more than four years, and it's a powerful instrument. > > >3) i'm thinking of including the construction of a web site as part of >the funding bid, and, as well as documenting the work made by us, I was >thinking that it might be useful to develop a reference resource (read: >links page) relating to the technology side of all this - would this be >useful ? or is it already being done so well somewhere that I don't need >to think about it - Good idea, but let's not re-invent the wheel. Let's instead update the dance and technology zone (art.net/~dtz). This was an excellent resource but I think has been a bit neglected by the community of late. It's probably time to revisit and all send updated info, yes? Good luck r R i c h a r d P o v a l l Senior Fellow, RESCEN (Centre for Research into Creation in the Performing Arts), Middlesex University (in assoc. with the South Bank, London) ========================= Court Gate Cottage, Harbourneford, South Brent, Devon TQ10 9DT UK. Home/Studio: +44 (0)1364 72044 Fax: +44 (0)1364 72046 </x-flowed>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 03/28/01 CST